Re: First experience with gcc-3.2 recompiles
On Sunday 25 August 2002 22:00, you wrote:
> Gerhard Tonn wrote:
> > As I have told in another thread, I am currently rebuilding all packages
> > depending on c++ on s390. All packages have been touched now. The results
> > are:
> > 406 packages have been built successfully
> > 222 packages depend on other packages built with gcc-3.2
> > 90 on qt libraries
> > 12 on libsigc++
> > 7 on gtkmm
> > 9 on fltk
> > ...
> > 246 packages haven't been built successfully
> > In most cases a compile error similar to
> > default argument given for parameter 12 of ...
> > after previous specification in ...
> > occurs.
> > The build logs of the packages can be found at
> > http://people.debian.org/~gt/gcc-3.2_transition
> I hate to say, but the list of failed packages needs to get
> investigated a little bit, since not all failures seem to be GCC 3.2
> and syntax related:
I have moved them to 4 subdirectories
- 157 packages in gcc-3.2_specific
- 46 packages in common (error occurs also with gcc-2.95)
- 3 packages in s390_specific (e.g. ICE)
- 24 packages in build_dep (if build dep packages are not installable)