[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[gwolf@gwolf.cx: Bug#158547: imp: Excessive packages listed as dependencies]



Hi

Is this really a bug?

Regards,

// Ola

----- Forwarded message from gwolf@gwolf.cx -----

Envelope-to: ola@opal.dhs.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 23:48:06 +0200
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#158547: imp: Excessive packages listed as dependencies
Reply-To: gwolf@gwolf.cx, 158547@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: gwolf@gwolf.cx
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>, imp@packages.qa.debian.org
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:48:02 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.158547.B.10304840389931@bugs.debian.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 158547
X-Debian-PR-Package: imp
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
From: gwolf@gwolf.cx
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 16:32:00 -0600 (CST)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Resent-Sender: Debian BTS <debbugs@master.debian.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=SENT_BY_BTS,NO_REAL_NAME,FORGED_RCVD_FOUND version=2.20
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: imp
Version: N/A
Severity: normal

IMP depends on many packages marked as essential, such as sed or grep, which
should not appear explicitly listed.

(It also depends on many packages from 'standard': binutils, perl, 
mail-transport-agent. I don't remember if those should be also listed)


-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux conetontli 2.4.18 #1 Thu Jun 13 09:08:16 CST 2002 alpha unknown unknown GNU/Linux



----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
 --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/  opal@debian.org                     Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11   \
|  opal@lysator.liu.se                 584 36 LINKÖPING         |
|  +46 (0)13-17 69 83                  +46 (0)70-332 1551       |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org             UIN/icq: 4912500         |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------



Reply to: