On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 19:30, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi! > > At te moment, there are a lot of old ITP's hanging around in the WNPP, Hi, When I was looking through the RFP list a while back, I noticed many of them were for packages that were not maintained upstream - sometimes they were still at the planning stage after a number of years; sometimes they had been abandoned (many napster clones); in other cases, upstream just seemed to be very amateurish with little sign of development (e.g. not using cvs; no mailing lists; seem to be only one developer; no documentation; latest 'news' on the site being from many months or years ago; poorly designed website). As I am not yet a developer, I did not try to close the RFP's. What action should be taken about such RFPs? -- +----------------------------------------------+ | Mark Howard cam.ac.uk mh344@ | | http://www.tildemh.com tildemh.com mh@ | +----------------------------------------------+
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part