Re: Are libtool .la files in non-dev library packages bugs?

To: Roberto Gordo Saez <rgs@linalco.com>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Are libtool .la files in non-dev library packages bugs?
From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 14:21:58 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020824122158.GD1004@212.23.136.22>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020820121018.GA4725@zombie.inka.de>
References: <[🔎] 20020820120144.GA15021@filemon> <[🔎] 20020820121018.GA4725@zombie.inka.de>

On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 02:10:18PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Because of naivity of some programers. I suggest to begin getting rid of
> such kludges and forbid usage of .la files at runtimer in the Policy for
> Sarge.

Policy is not a stick to beat with.  If there is a bug, report it as such,
and leave it to the maintainer and upstream developers to fix it if in
doubt.

Thanks,
Marcus

-- 
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU      http://www.gnu.org    marcus@gnu.org
Marcus Brinkmann              The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are libtool .la files in non-dev library packages bugs?
  - From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>

References:
- Re: Are libtool .la files in non-dev library packages bugs?
  - From: Roberto Gordo Saez <rgs@linalco.com>
- Re: Are libtool .la files in non-dev library packages bugs?
  - From: Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Dock Apps packaging, round 2
Next by Date: dpkg should prompt re missing conffiles [was Re: When bind9 reinstalls, no db.root]
Previous by thread: Re: Are libtool .la files in non-dev library packages bugs?
Next by thread: Re: Are libtool .la files in non-dev library packages bugs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread