On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 23:28, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote: > > Why? > > Can't we just use it in Debian? > > Are you mad? What happens if the ELF format or gnu upstream start using that > value for something else? I forgot to mention that if they want binary compatibility, their extension must be gracefully ignorable and if there are no symbol name conflicts my proposed implementation is equivalent to ignoring the field.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part