On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:43:58AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > > > I beg your pardon? Which naiveness? That particular bit of libtool > > solves a very real problem: dlopen is *not* portable. > > Careful here, dlopen is defined by SUSv2, all the libtool hackage is does > is allow OS's to get away with not conforming to SUSv2 for longer :< It also supports platforms which do not have shared libraries. I didn't think SuSv2 actually required them (can't see anything that does, references welcome). -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing, `. `' | Imperial College, `- -><- | London, UK
Attachment:
pgpdh9NMj_gfH.pgp
Description: PGP signature