Re: Are libtool .la files in non-dev library packages bugs?
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > Not only that, it's only useful for linking, so has no reason being in
> > > the primary runtime.
> >
> > ltdl needs them at runtime.
>
> Then ltdl is broken. How does one install libfoo.so.1 and libfoo.so.2
> and only have libfoo.la, and ltdl expect to work?
I was always under the impression that ltdl only really needed the .la
files on defective OS's, not on linux..
Just look in a .la, there is nothing in there that can't be properly done
by ld.so.
Jason
Reply to: