On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 02:53:22PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The majority of such packages links to libstdc++ only, so there may be
> > no need for action at all.
>
> Do we have non-free C++ packages that we have to worry about? My
> comments were more directed at unpackaged software that users may be
> running on their Debian systems. In those cases, providing a way to get
> their binaries working again /after/ we break them is only a little bit
> better than forcing them to recompile.
Well there's the proprietary JDK, but it already uses a -compat package
library.
*shrug*
--
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@bluecherry.net> Don't feed the sigs
<Overfiend> xhost +localhost should only be done by people who would
paint their hostname and root password on an interstate
overpass.
Attachment:
pgppapaxxPe3v.pgp
Description: PGP signature