[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GCC 3.2 transition



> 
> If upstream aren't inclined to change their Linux soname for the new gcc,
> though, not changing our soname but doing the upgrade anyway seems the
> best option.
> 

even if some are willing not all will be.  Then we have to worry about dead
upstreams too.  It seems like changing the sonames to solve this simply won't
work.

I had forgotten we solved the libc5 issue by moving the libs to a new directory
and making ld.so look there.  Been a while (-:



Reply to: