W liście z wto, 13-08-2002, godz. 20:40, Tom Tromey pisze: > >> I've seen some of the follow up comments to your post. Regarding > >> 'gij': by looking very quickly at its interpreter.cc source file, I > >> detected important race conditions (for multithreaded apps). > Grzegorz, perhaps you could get Etienne to file a bug report for us. [ I explained that part in private mail ] > I considered discussing Etienne's other points in detail, but I doubt > this is the appropriate forum. My only concern is that people not > spread misinformation about gcj and gij: gcj is not only about native I think you'll be able to ask him directly about where the problems exactly are. However i don't think he ever thought about spreading misinformation - he surely has proves behind his words. But remember, that in original it was _private_ mail, not intended to be reason for further, detailed discussion (at lest not atm, as he's _busy_) The point here was to more-less explain why I will give a chance to another free tools, not kaffe, not gij (with gcj) - but SableVM. It appears (if you belive in what he said) - that there _are_ reasons to make such choice. > code, it intends to be a complete java environment. It already Yes, we're aiming at the same goal apparently. > provides quite a bit toward that goal. Lack of a bytecode interpreter > can't be considered as a reason to avoid gcj. (Quality of the > interpreter may be, but that is a different sort of discussion.) I only hope you're not trying to blame me for not choosing "your" solution? ;-)) Don't forget to contact Etienne directly (later). Best regards Grzegorz B. Prokopski
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature