Re: RFD: Architecture field being retarded? [was: How to specify architectures *not* to be built?]
>>>>> "Roland" == Roland Bauerschmidt <rb@debian.org> writes:
Roland> Andreas Rottmann wrote:
>> I think in the light of upcoming *BSD ports, the HURD port and
>> the (hopefully not too distant ;-)) possibility of getting the
>> HURD ported to other CPU families, we really need improvement
>> here.
Roland> http://master.debian.org/~brinkmd/arch-handling.txt
This looks like much more comprehensive and consistent solution than
what I have come up with. Any plans to make this real?
Regards, Andy
--
Andreas Rottmann | Dru@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | a.rottmann@gmx.at
http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62
Reply to: