On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 10:08:21PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote: > > this answer was described in the above. for example, if a > > commercial program as you says links GTK+2.0 and libpng2 > > *directly*, (and if it is provided as package, then if > > libgtk2.0-0png3 provides libgtk2.0-0), it won't works > > correctly. anyway those programs needs to be rebuilt. > > I still have not seen any good reason to do this, other than "libpng3 is > the future" and "other distributions do this." Admittedly the latter is > not a bad reason. In fact, Debian is the only distribution with a GTK+ 2.0 which does not use libpng3 at this time. -- Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@bluecherry.net> You're entitled to my opinion <Knghtbrd> joeyh now has a terminal at the couch? <Knghtbrd> That guy is wired, I swear => <doogie> Knghtbrd: laptop <doogie> and I don't mean the cats.
Attachment:
pgpJjnadidVPd.pgp
Description: PGP signature