[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#155689: libgtk2.0-png3: -png3 should Provides: libgtk2.0-0



>> Akira TAGOH <tagoh@debian.org> writes:

 > I've sent a mail to the list several days before uploading new
 > GTK+2.0. Did someone reply about it?  made sure no objection, and
 > I've uploaded it.

 Yups, pardon me, it's completely my fault.  I should have checked *the*
 list, sorry.

 > Are you saying I should renamed all package name?  even if people
 > didn't installs -dev, -common may works against them.

 I am saying you should revert your change as soon as possible.

 But since I'm getting this weird déjà vu, please ignore me.  I won't
 argue with you two weeks long about something that should be done
 within 24 hours and won't be ever carried out.  It's just not worth it.
 I'll just go back to my corner and fix my own bugs.

 > I think a good way of fixing this problem is each maintainer rebuild
 > their package anyway.

 Yeppers.  That will surely work.  Just make sure you don't close this
 bug before that happens.

-- 
Marcelo



Reply to: