Re: This is how packaging should be done.

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: This is how packaging should be done.
From: Teemu Hukkanen <tjhukkan@iki.fi>
Date: 10 Jun 2002 17:29:30 +0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 86ofejgqb9.fsf@bugger.fishpool.fi>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020610123754.GA30112@bingo.localdomain>
References: <[🔎] 20020610114132.GA29702@bingo.localdomain> <[🔎] 20020610082241.O13378@justice.loyola.edu> <[🔎] 20020610123754.GA30112@bingo.localdomain>

Jeremiah Mahler <jmahler@pacbell.net> writes:

> What about the idea that anyone (not just maintainers) can submit
> packages and they will available immediately to others without
> having to go through an intermediate person.
> 
> In contrast, Debian allows only specific people to add new packages
> and only the maintainer can fix their packages. This requires work
> by specific people which makes development slow.

Redhat contrib. 'nuff said.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- This is how packaging should be done.
  - From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmahler@pacbell.net>
- Re: This is how packaging should be done.
  - From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
- Re: This is how packaging should be done.
  - From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmahler@pacbell.net>

Prev by Date: Re: This is how packaging should be done.
Next by Date: Re: Wish: Unfreeze Woody and start anew
Previous by thread: Re: This is how packaging should be done.
Next by thread: Re: This is how packaging should be done.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread