Re: This is how packaging should be done.

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: Jeremiah Mahler <jmahler@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: This is how packaging should be done.
From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 08:22:41 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020610082241.O13378@justice.loyola.edu>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Jeremiah Mahler <jmahler@pacbell.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020610114132.GA29702@bingo.localdomain>; from jmahler@pacbell.net on Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 04:41:32AM -0700
References: <[🔎] 20020610114132.GA29702@bingo.localdomain>

On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 04:41:32AM -0700, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
> I am curios to hear what Debian users and packagers think.

I think that I don't see anything exciting. Perhaps if you were more
specific about what you like?

-- 
Mike Stone


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: This is how packaging should be done.
  - From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmahler@pacbell.net>
- Re: This is how packaging should be done.
  - From: Moshe Zadka <m@moshez.org>

References:
- This is how packaging should be done.
  - From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmahler@pacbell.net>

Prev by Date: Re: This is how packaging should be done.
Next by Date: Re: Wish: Unfreeze Woody and start anew
Previous by thread: Re: This is how packaging should be done.
Next by thread: Re: This is how packaging should be done.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread