[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#147303: ITP: winex -- A DESCRIPTION



I'M NOT MEMER OF YOUR MAILING LISTS. MY MAIL IS : PONIK@POBOX.SK
(PONIK@PROVER.SK IS ONLY FORWARD FROM PONIK@POBOX.SK).

WHY THIS MAILS COME TO ME?
EVERY DAY COME TO ME 200 MAILS FROM YOUR MAILING LISTS.

CAN YOU DO SOMETHING WITH IT?

     THANK YOU.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rodrigo Moya" <rodrigo@gnome-db.org>
To: "Peter S Galbraith" <p.galbraith@globetrotter.net>
Cc: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: Bug#147303: ITP: winex -- A DESCRIPTION


> On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 03:19, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 08:26:01PM +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > > So, my question is, is there any reason why all the debian/ dirs are
not
> > > > sent upstream for inclusion in CVS? As a maintainer, I would
gratefully
> > > > accept any patch for doing so to the modules I maintain.
> > >
> > > Most(?) developers don't like this approach, because it's not easy to
> > > get stuff in sync when doing a release,
> >
> > I like it when I have CVS access and participate fully upstream.
> >
> in that case, it would be a good idea, IMO, if debian developers asked
> upstream authors about CVS access and having the debian/ directory in
> it. In cases where upstream agrees, that would be really good for us :-)
>
> I could, for the GNOME CVS, push for that to happen, so if GNOME package
> maintainers want to do that, just tell me and I'll try to do whatever I
> can.
>
> cheers
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: