Re: Bug#147303: ITP: winex -- A DESCRIPTION
I'M NOT MEMER OF YOUR MAILING LISTS. MY MAIL IS : PONIK@POBOX.SK
(PONIK@PROVER.SK IS ONLY FORWARD FROM PONIK@POBOX.SK).
WHY THIS MAILS COME TO ME?
EVERY DAY COME TO ME 200 MAILS FROM YOUR MAILING LISTS.
CAN YOU DO SOMETHING WITH IT?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rodrigo Moya" <email@example.com>
To: "Peter S Galbraith" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: Bug#147303: ITP: winex -- A DESCRIPTION
> On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 03:19, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > Michael Banck <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 08:26:01PM +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > > So, my question is, is there any reason why all the debian/ dirs are
> > > > sent upstream for inclusion in CVS? As a maintainer, I would
> > > > accept any patch for doing so to the modules I maintain.
> > >
> > > Most(?) developers don't like this approach, because it's not easy to
> > > get stuff in sync when doing a release,
> > I like it when I have CVS access and participate fully upstream.
> in that case, it would be a good idea, IMO, if debian developers asked
> upstream authors about CVS access and having the debian/ directory in
> it. In cases where upstream agrees, that would be really good for us :-)
> I could, for the GNOME CVS, push for that to happen, so if GNOME package
> maintainers want to do that, just tell me and I'll try to do whatever I
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org