Re: Bug#147303: ITP: winex -- A DESCRIPTION
I'M NOT MEMER OF YOUR MAILING LISTS.
WHY THIS MAILS COME TO ME?
EVERY DAY COME TO ME 200 MAILS FROM YOUR MAILING LISTS.
CAN YOU DO SOMETHING WITH IT?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter S Galbraith" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:19 AM
Subject: Re: Bug#147303: ITP: winex -- A DESCRIPTION
> Michael Banck <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 08:26:01PM +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > So, my question is, is there any reason why all the debian/ dirs are
> > > sent upstream for inclusion in CVS? As a maintainer, I would
> > > accept any patch for doing so to the modules I maintain.
> > Most(?) developers don't like this approach, because it's not easy to
> > get stuff in sync when doing a release,
> I like it when I have CVS access and participate fully upstream.
> > and if there's no debian patch
> > this means upstream will have to release a new version even if only a
> > debian related issue is addressed.
> Not necessarily. Upload a .orig.tar.gz containing the debian directory
> and an empty .diff.gz (and not a .tar.gz file without a diff.gz). This
> leaves you free to patch in stuff as version -2 with the patch going
> into the diff.gz file.
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org