[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#147303: ITP: winex -- A DESCRIPTION

On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 03:19, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 08:26:01PM +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > So, my question is, is there any reason why all the debian/ dirs are not
> > > sent upstream for inclusion in CVS? As a maintainer, I would gratefully
> > > accept any patch for doing so to the modules I maintain.
> > 
> > Most(?) developers don't like this approach, because it's not easy to
> > get stuff in sync when doing a release, 
> I like it when I have CVS access and participate fully upstream.
in that case, it would be a good idea, IMO, if debian developers asked
upstream authors about CVS access and having the debian/ directory in
it. In cases where upstream agrees, that would be really good for us :-)

I could, for the GNOME CVS, push for that to happen, so if GNOME package
maintainers want to do that, just tell me and I'll try to do whatever I


To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: