[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: possible mass-filing of bugs, continued, script refined: list of packages that apparently have disparity between package name and shared lib soname

On 02 Jun 2002 15:58:24 +0200,
Andreas Rottmann <a.rottmann@gmx.at> wrote:
> Is it stated somewhere in policy that the SOVERSION has to be the last
> part of the package name? I can't find that requirement there...
The Policy says (version, section 11.3):
|      For a straightforward library which has a development environment and
|      a runtime kit including just shared libraries you need to create two
|      packages: `<libraryname><soversion>', where `<soversion>' is the
|      version number in the soname of the shared library[1] and
|      `<libraryname><soversion>-dev'.

Oohara Yuuma <oohara@libra.interq.or.jp>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170  1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695

I always put away what I take.
--- Ryuji Akai, "Star away"

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: