Re: possible mass-filing of bugs, continued, script refined: list of packages that apparently have disparity between package name and shared lib soname

To: Andreas Rottmann <a.rottmann@gmx.at>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: possible mass-filing of bugs, continued, script refined: list of packages that apparently have disparity between package name and shared lib soname
From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 01:48:30 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020602014830.67498302.dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
In-reply-to: <871ybzdm2u.fsf@alice.rhinosaur.lan>
References: <20020522143137.72ef815c.dancer@netfort.gr.jp> <871ybzdm2u.fsf@alice.rhinosaur.lan>

Andreas Rottmann <a.rottmann@gmx.at> immo vero scripsit:

> > Maintainer: Andreas Rottmann <rotty@debian.org>	usr/lib/libsigcx-gtk.so.0 libs/libsigcx0-gtk 0
> 
> I dpn't think this is a bug -- this library is mainly a split-out of
> libsigcx0, to have libsigcx0 not depend on GTK+. libsigcx0-gtk and
> libsigcx0 will always have the same SONAME.

This is at least a namespace pollution.



regards,
	junichi

-- 
dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa   http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423  7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: possible mass-filing of bugs, continued, script refined: list of packages that apparently have disparity between package name and shared lib soname
  - From: Andreas Rottmann <a.rottmann@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: Uninstallable packages in woody
Next by Date: Re: CPU specific/optimized Debian builds ?
Previous by thread: Re: Mozilla & Galeon updates in sid
Next by thread: Re: possible mass-filing of bugs, continued, script refined: list of packages that apparently have disparity between package name and shared lib soname
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread