Re: Woody release - WHAT is current status
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> If what you're looking for is an interesting distraction, then you might
> be interested to know that "accepted autobuilding" and autobuilding of
> woody-proposed-updates are partially/mostly implemented. The former means
> that the autobuilders for most architectures (all but hurd, m68k and arm,
> I believe) will try to build your package half an hour or so after you
> upload it. The latter, when it's more complete than it is now, will give
> us a bunch more flexibility handling the release and has probably been
> long overdue.
I think this level of detail is *really* good to hear.
> And for those of you who're already typing up replies along the lines of
> "WHY'RE YOU WASTING TIME ON STUPID THINGS LIKE THIS???", both the above
> are necessary components of effective handling of security autobuilding,
> as well as being valuable in and of themselves.
Heck! Wasting time on stupid things like this? I've been hoping for
something like this for a long time, and it's really cool to see that
it will be part of the woody release structure.
So count me in as an unqualified fan.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: