Re: Bugs being closed faster than filed: Re: Wishlist for woody+1
> ...which would appear to indicate that it's the green/cyan lines that
> represents archived bugs, contradicting the descriptions.
No.
> Oddly the graphs appear to go well into June 2002, too.
I think the graph includes a "forecast" when already closed bugs will be
archived.
So the graphs with unkown values (active/opened) flatline in the future,
whereas the archived graph lags 28 days, thus can be plotted longer.
> http://bugs.debian.org/~ajt/graph.png
>
> which is that since the number of bugs is increasing, more are being
> filed than closed, although the difference is fairly marginal.
Actually i don't trust that graph as much: we've been pushing hard at
reducing the number of bugs, and i don't see any bug squish partys in
there. You only see the mass-filed bugs.
Actually i think the bug report rate _has_ to go down, as we have been
keeping back new versions in favour of getting the old ones stable. that
certainly should have an effect on the bug reporting rate, shouldn't it?
So i guess as soon as woody is released, and more experimental versions
hit unstable (well, some are already...) the situation will be back to
normal...
Greetings,
Erich
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: