Re: lightning quick woody+1 release scenarios (was Re: Wishlist for woody+1)
On Mon, 2002-05-27 at 16:36, David Starner wrote:
> I'd like to see a GCC 3.1, with a working GNAT, on all architectures. We
Somebody said just recently that GNAT 3.1 is broken (see thread "Re: gcc
3.1 packages"), and that no-one knows when it will be fixed.
I am not sure what the problems are though.
--
Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: