Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
From: David Starner <starner@okstate.edu>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 04:41:13 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 5.1.0.14.0.20020527043840.009e9ec0@email.okstate.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3CF1E022.4060007@shanghai.fr>
References: <[🔎] 20020520024119.E200@dose.pro-linux.de> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0205191912160.9857-100000@yakko.doogie.org> <[🔎] 20020520004634.GN14931@212.23.136.22>

At 09:28 AM 5/27/02 +0200, HAESSIG Jean-Christophe wrote:

why not putting them in /bin/modules


Because directories in /bin are prohibited by the FHS, so we might
as well stay with /hurd?


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
  - From: HAESSIG Jean-Christophe <pshunter@shanghai.fr>

References:
- Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
  - From: Wolfgang Jährling <wolfgang@pro-linux.de>
- Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
  - From: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>
- Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
  - From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
- Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
  - From: HAESSIG Jean-Christophe <pshunter@shanghai.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: Clarification of WineX packaging request
Next by Date: Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy
Previous by thread: Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
Next by thread: Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread