Re: some stuff up for adoption
hi,
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 04:51:38PM +0200, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> As for kernel-patch-int; i'm offering it in case there are people who need
> this. In my opinion it should be removed, and replaced with cryptoapi (which
> i ITP'd a while ago; orphaning these will probably give me the opportunity
> to finally upload it :) ). The format of volumes encrypted by
> kernel-patch-int and cryptoapi differs, and kernel-patch-int volumes will
> not be usable by cryptoapi. If people actually use kernel-patch-int, it's
> worth it to keep it for compatibility reasons.
why should kernel-patch-int be removed? (besides having a really
outdated version).
so long
Othmar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: