Re: [RFC] New keymap/language configuration system.
Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> writes:
> On Sat, 25 May 2002, [iso-8859-1] Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> Furthermore, I would like to know why people want to focus on d-i
>> rather than PGI which seems to more advanced than d-i on many
>> grounds. This is a question, not an attack.
>
> Well, for one thing: PGI requires a hell of a lot more available RAM than
> d-i. Using PGI as a default installer would practically rule out the
> possibility of installing an m68k-based system.
>
> Not to mention the fact that PGI, being a 'smart' installer, requires more
> maintenance than an installer such as d-i. With eleven architectures to
> maintain, this is a pain (which is probably the reason why PGI does not
> support all architectures).
Alright. Thank you for providing those details.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: