Re: [RFC] New keymap/language configuration system.
On Sat, 25 May 2002, [iso-8859-1] Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Furthermore, I would like to know why people want to focus on d-i
> rather than PGI which seems to more advanced than d-i on many
> grounds. This is a question, not an attack.
Well, for one thing: PGI requires a hell of a lot more available RAM than
d-i. Using PGI as a default installer would practically rule out the
possibility of installing an m68k-based system.
Not to mention the fact that PGI, being a 'smart' installer, requires more
maintenance than an installer such as d-i. With eleven architectures to
maintain, this is a pain (which is probably the reason why PGI does not
support all architectures).
--
wouter dot verhelst at advalvas dot be
"Human knowledge belongs to the world"
-- From the movie "Antitrust"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: