Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 05:06:35PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> writes:
> > Agreed, but that doesn't change the point. Linux kernel modules
> > are not libraries but we store them in /lib. We don't need to
> > store translators in /hurd either.
>
> Huh? Are you arguing that:
>
> 1) Everything should be put in /lib?
> 2) Everything that is a kernel module should be in /lib?
> 3) Those things specified by the FHS should be in /lib?
None of the above, but that Hurd translators don't *need* a new
top level directory any more than Linux kernel modules do.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: