Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd

To: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
Cc: Debian Devel List <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Date: 23 May 2002 17:06:35 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87r8k2mmt0.fsf@becket.becket.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020523222602.GA28608@silly.cloud.net.au>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.40.0205221855250.3865-100000@localhost> <[🔎] 87off8ro5m.fsf@lgh163a.kemisten.nu> <[🔎] 20020523122438.GA2418@silly.cloud.net.au> <[🔎] 877klun7zt.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 20020523222602.GA28608@silly.cloud.net.au>

Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> writes:

> Agreed, but that doesn't change the point. Linux kernel modules
> are not libraries but we store them in /lib. We don't need to
> store translators in /hurd either.

Huh?  Are you arguing that:

1) Everything should be put in /lib?
2) Everything that is a kernel module should be in /lib?
3) Those things specified by the FHS should be in /lib?

Thomas

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
  - From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>

References:
- Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
  - From: Emile van Bergen <e-advies@evbergen.xs4all.nl>
- Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
  - From: ams@kemisten.nu (Alfred M. Szmidt)
- Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
  - From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
  - From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
  - From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: CPU specific/optimized Debian builds ?
Next by Date: Re: Bug#147303: ITP: winex -- A DESCRIPTION
Previous by thread: Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
Next by thread: Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread