On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 12:38:27AM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote: > If we do provide the ability for users to compile their own CPU optimised > binaries, then how can it be a bad thing ? Well, every user may apt-get source his favourite package and modify debian/rules. This isn't optimal but global CFLAGS for _all_ packages are impossible even on one architecture like i386. Some programs simply won't work when optimized due to compiler errors. > Would it be bad if their binaries are only marginally more efficient ? You can waste as much CPU time as you want on you machine, but just don't use a .d.o machine to build optimized versions. And please imagine the waste of diskspace if every package was uploaded with --- oops, lost the track of newest instuctions sets -- at least 4 different versions as the kernel images already are (which makes sense for this special package)? > The only "cost" involved is that it would require us to be more organised. Please stop saying "we have to do something", do something yourself. Please think up a plan on how to accomplish an "Optimized Debian" distribution. Talk to the ftp-masters and admins about your plan. Discuss it with us. Then we'll maybefind your idea attractive. Otherwise, please stop the thread. CU Thimo -- Thimo Neubauer <thimo@debian.org> Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 frozen! See http://www.debian.org/ for details
Attachment:
pgpviythVtBde.pgp
Description: PGP signature