Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
On Tue, 21 May 2002, Santiago Vila wrote:
> [ Sorry for the off-topic ].
>
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > What I want to know, is why can't existing locations be used for what hurd
> > developers want to place in /hurd.
>
> AFAIK, "what hurd developers want to place in /hurd" has always been there,
> so as far as GNU/Hurd is concerned, /hurd is the "existing location".
>
> So, hurd developers are already using "existing locations".
As pointed out in another place, technically anything can be put anywhere,
but this would cause untold confusion.
I would suggest that /hurd is the least confusing place to have a unique
and very important part of the GNU/Hurd os.
Phil.
--
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street, Abbotsford, Dunedin, New Zealand
+64 3 488 2818 Fax +64 3 488 2875 Mobile 025 267 9420
philipc@copyleft.co.nz - preferred. philipc@debian.org
I sell GNU/Linux & GNU/Hurd CDs. See http://www.copyleft.co.nz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: