Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd

To: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Date: 20 May 2002 18:26:21 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87r8k6wate.fsf@becket.becket.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020521001929.GA12458@dman.com>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0205201532350.3835-100000@gradall.private.brainfood.com> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.44.0205210025410.11188-314159@home.unex.es> <[🔎] 20020521001929.GA12458@dman.com>

Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org> writes:

> A decent command interpreter could help make this pain nonexistent, if
> there's a reason things shouldn't be in /hurd.

No such reason has been articulated.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
  - From: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>
- Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
- Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
  - From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
Next by Date: Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
Previous by thread: Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
Next by thread: Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread