Re: where do NEW packages go?

To: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Debian Policy <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: where do NEW packages go?
From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Date: 20 May 2002 10:21:33 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87bsba3fc2.fsf@becket.becket.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020520165629.GC16061@netexpress.net>
References: <[🔎] 20020519170403.GC7538@dodds.net> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0205191703480.9857-100000@yakko.doogie.org> <[🔎] 20020520165629.GC16061@netexpress.net>

Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net> writes:

> However, the Hurd port is asking for Policy to be
> *relaxed* [...]

NO, the Debian GNU/Hurd porting team has *NOT* asked for any such
relaxation.  

Thomas

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: where do NEW packages go?
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>

References:
- Re: where do NEW packages go?
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
- Re: where do NEW packages go?
  - From: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>
- Re: where do NEW packages go?
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>

Prev by Date: Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
Next by Date: Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
Previous by thread: Re: where do NEW packages go?
Next by thread: Re: where do NEW packages go?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread