[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 88 Priority violations in woody



> If you had waited for proper discussion, as the developer's reference
> advises, you wouldn't be getting flamed; you'd simply have been told
> that there were more effective ways of getting this fixed than 88 RC
> bugs, and we wouldn't have to go through this. That's all.

Well, you're right.  Serious error of protocol on my part.

--
Thomas


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: