Re: New Package Developer

[Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>]

Tollef Fog Heen <tollef@add.no> scripsit:

> * Michael Weber 
> 
> | I decided in favor of a more complicated Depends line at that time,
> | but if (despite of keeping all the above in mind) there is a
> | convincing argument for a name-versioned package, please speak up. :)
> 
> Make the package provide ghc5.02.2 and have packages depend on that?
> 

So that every new release of ghc will break old programs
compiled against older ghc?


regards,
	junichi


-- 
dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa   http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423  7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org