On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 02:24:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 06:55:52PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 07:35:34PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > > although I wish they could be more transparent[1] about it. > > > [1] REJECTED > > Does it fail to comply with policy? [blahblahblah] > > Unfortunately transparency requires having the time and desire to deal > with the mindless flamage that always results... I think not being transparent only takes a lot more time, like this thread. Besides that you can at least tell somebody who put a lot of time into a package that is rejected and why. Nobody is asking a reply to any flamage. Jeroen Dekkers -- Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: jdekkers@jabber.org Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org IRC: jeroen@openprojects
Attachment:
pgp8_Qlp4gZeG.pgp
Description: PGP signature