[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#144046: general: Sections are not finely grained



>   That's exactly the problem: it's been discussed, discussed, discussed,
> and then discussed some more.  Either write a real policy proposal or
> start submitting patches/data.  More talking won't tell us anything we
> don't already know.

I've postponed my workings on this until woody is released actually.
I'm preparing a big todo-list for after-woody, where this is one of the
major topics.
Unfortunately i have postponed it partly due to lack of time, too ;)

On the menu thing: i'd suggest we start adding useful keywords first,
then play around with different trees of arranging them, then use the
experience we gained from this structuring to make a better menu
structure.
Menu is missing i18n, too, btw... as does apt for woody... *complain*
Fortunately there is aptitude ;)

%s/keywords/tags/

Unfortunately gnome and kde have a fixed menu structure which isn't too
fine-grained either... Should we consider overriding their menu
structure, too? Or better stick with the standards there?

Greetings,
Erich


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: