[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#144107: ITP: mplayer -- Movie player for Linux



from the homepage

*  100% GPL - yeah, so what?
* runtime CPU detection code - any x86 MPlayer binary can run on "any"
other x86 CPU

On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 18:34, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 02:26:30PM -0500, Luis Bustamante wrote:
> > MPlayer is a movie player for Linux.
> 
> http://www.MPlayerHQ.hu/DOCS/faq.html says:
> 
>    Q:  Are there rpm/deb/... packages of MPlayer?
>    A:  You can make a .deb package for yourself, check the Debian
>        packaging section. It's strongly discouraged to use precompiled
>        packages of MPlayer, since it (currently) highly depends on
>        compile-time options and optimizations! Precompiled packages are
>        COMPLETELY unsupported by the MPlayer team!
> 
> Also http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/users_against_developers.html#binary:
> 
>   * MPlayer's speed (MMX, SSE, fastmemcpy, etc) optimizations are
>     determined during compilation. Thus a compiled binary contains very
>     processor-specific code. An MPlayer binary compiled for K6 will die
>     on Pentiums and vice versa. This has to be workarounded by runtime
>     detection, which is not an easy thing to do becase it causes massive
>     speed decrease. If you don't believe (it was explained in details
>     10000 times on mplayer-users, search the archive), solve it and send
>     us a patch. Someone begun work on it, but disappeared since then.
>   * MPlayer's video/audio system is not plugin based. It is compiled
>     into the binary, thus making the binary depend on various libraries
>     (the GUI depends on GTK, DivX4 depends on libdivxdecore, SDL depends
>     on libSDL, every SDL release contains an unique bug that has to be
>     workarounded during compiletime, X11 output compiles differently for
>     X3 and X4, etc). You may say: yes, let's make 30 versions of
>     downloadable binaries! We won't. We will make these stuff pluggable
>     in the future.
> 
> Do you have a response to these? It sounds at the moment that the
> mplayer developers would rather not see any binary packages; at least,
> if they've changed their mind about this, they haven't updated their
> documentation.
> 
> -- 
> Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: