[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[installer@ftp-master.debian.org: heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.changes REJECTED]



Hello,

I received both these emails.

Did my package get accepted or not?

If not, what was wrong with it?

Did my package get installed or not?
(normally "NEW" packages means it needs to be manually approved).

Thanks.
-- 
Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
--- Begin Message ---
Rejected: heimdal-clients-x_0.4e-14_i386.deb: timestamp check failed; caught exceptions.SystemError
Rejected: libasn1-5-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb: timestamp check failed; caught exceptions.SystemError


===

If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.

Your rejected files are in incoming/REJECT/.  (Some may also be in
incoming/ if your .changes file was unparsable.)  If only some of the
files need to repaired, you may move any good files back to incoming/.
Please remove any bad files from incoming/REJECT/.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
heimdal-clients-x_0.4e-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/heimdal-clients-x_0.4e-14_i386.deb
heimdal-clients_0.4e-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/heimdal-clients_0.4e-14_i386.deb
heimdal-dev_0.4e-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/heimdal-dev_0.4e-14_i386.deb
heimdal-docs_0.4e-14_all.deb
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/heimdal-docs_0.4e-14_all.deb
heimdal-kdc_0.4e-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/heimdal-kdc_0.4e-14_i386.deb
heimdal-lib_0.4e-14_all.deb
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/heimdal-lib_0.4e-14_all.deb
heimdal-servers-x_0.4e-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/heimdal-servers-x_0.4e-14_i386.deb
heimdal-servers_0.4e-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/heimdal-servers_0.4e-14_i386.deb
heimdal_0.4e-14.diff.gz
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/heimdal_0.4e-14.diff.gz
heimdal_0.4e-14.dsc
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/heimdal_0.4e-14.dsc
libasn1-5-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/libasn1-5-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
libcomerr1-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/libcomerr1-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
libgssapi1-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/libgssapi1-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
libhdb7-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/libhdb7-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
libkadm5clnt4-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/libkadm5clnt4-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
libkadm5srv7-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/libkadm5srv7-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
(new) libkafs0-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb extra net
Libraries for Heimdal Kerberos
 Heimdal is a free implementation of Kerberos 5, that aims to be
 compatible with MIT Kerberos.
 .
 This package contains the library for KAFS support.
libkrb5-17-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/libkrb5-17-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
libotp0-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/libotp0-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
libroken9-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/libroken9-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
libsl0-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/libsl0-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
libss0-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/heimdal/libss0-heimdal_0.4e-14_i386.deb
Changes: heimdal (0.4e-14) unstable; urgency=low
 .
  * Attempt to recompile with krb4 support. Closes: #143273.
    For some reason this was marked as grave, even though the
    rest of Heimdal functioned OK.
  * Reopens bug: cyclic dependancies exist between Heimdal and
    Kerberos4kth. This really needs to get fixed.
  * Attempt to fix this in debian/patches-0.4e-trial (still needs
    further work), but this failed as autoconf in Debian doesn't like
    autoconf files used in Heimdal.
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 143273 


Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of
the override file.  It is ok otherwise, so please be patient.  New
packages are usually added to the override file about once a week.

You may have gotten the distribution wrong.  You'll get warnings above
if files already exist in other distributions.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: