Re: Antigen found =*.pif file
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 07:41:42PM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:24:51 -0600
> "Joel Baker" <lucifer@lightbearer.com> wrote:
> > I don't think that declaring something which complies with RFC
> > 2821/2822(the core SMTP-based email RFCs) is a good idea. The message
> > should not have left the remote server without a qualified domain, but
> > this is a bug in *their* implementation, *not* in the receiving MTA.
> >
> > Please do more research into the standards before making such a claim
> > next
>
> Have you done yours? Quoting from RFC 2822:
> "In all cases, the "From:" field SHOULD NOT contain any mailbox that
> does not belong to the author(s) of the message."
Are we talking about From:, or From_? Only the former is specified in 2822,
the latter is from 2821 (which has no such specification, AFAICT).
Rewriting the From: header is, indeed, not good; I was under the impression
that we were, however, seeing From_ rewritten.
--
***************************************************************************
Joel Baker System Administrator - lightbearer.com
lucifer@lightbearer.com http://users.lightbearer.com/lucifer/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: