Re: Please test this woody cd image
#include <hallo.h>
Matt Zimmerman wrote on Wed Apr 10, 2002 um 09:31:12PM:
> > Well, no. :) idepci is known to fail for people with scsi and new ide
> > hardware, so it's not really the best choice either. There probably is
> > no best choice, but a system with a menu where you can choose a choice
> > is probably better than any arbitrary default.
>
> I have installed many SCSI systems (including the one that I'm using right
> now) with potato CD #1, which I assume has a similar configuration. I've
Your assumption is WRONG. The old vanilla Flavor used there had lots of
drivers. Idepci does not.
> I absolutely agree that a choice on CD 1 would be superior, especially since
> it would make it possible to have the choice of a 2.4 kernel while only
> using one CD. But I think it would be even better to make a high-quality
Yeah, highquality Debian distro, not installalbe on many modern systems.
Gruss/Regards,
Eduard.
--
php ist an sich ne recht nutzlose sprache wenn da nicht soviele dinge so
einfach drin moeglich waeren
-- Getty in #debian.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: