Re: How about pptp-linux? (was: Why was libpam-pgsql removed from the woody lineup?)
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:57:00AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Mon 08 Apr 2002, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:40:04AM -0700, David D.W. Downey wrote:
> > > Just wondering why libpam-pgsql was removed from the woody lineup.
> >
> > It has not. Check madison's output on pandora.
>
> On a related note:
> No one's responded to my question as to why pptp-linux was removed.
> Its last RC bug was resolved already by the version in testing before it
> was removed from testing. It's a pretty important package for those who
> use ADSL, at least here in the Netherlands.
I heard a rumour that it was removed because kernel-patch-mppe is buggy
and pptp-linux claims in its description that it needs that. I have no
idea whether that's the real reason.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: