On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 05:22:53PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: > On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:29:27PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > > IMO, an FDL-licensed document with invariant sections is non-free. As a > > > user of Debian, I'd like to know that they're not installed on my system > > > if I'm only using packages from main. > > > > The FDL is not DFSG-compliant, but that doesn't make it non-free. > > By the definitions we have given "non-free", it is exactly that. If it was software, it was non-free. Our definitions are only about software. The GNU FDL is about documentation, which is a totally different. Besides that, are our definitions right? Jeroen Dekkers -- Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: jdekkers@jabber.org Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org IRC: jeroen@openprojects
Attachment:
pgpufoyRlnF33.pgp
Description: PGP signature