On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:02:07AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 01:33:11PM +0200, Thimo Neubauer wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:24:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > kvdr masqmail xtell > > > > As much as I like to have woody released soon, I'm quite confused > > because I don't understand why masqmail has to go: > > > > masqmail (- to 0.1.16-2) > > > > * Maintainer: Debian QA Group > > * 12 days old (needed 10 days) > > * Trying to remove package, not update it > > * Not considered > > I understand it had an RC bug (#138124) at the point when it was > removed. > > > None of these packages have RC bugs. masqmail itself just has two > > important bugs which will even be closed in the next release. What is > > the problem? Did I miss something? > > Only that not all of the removals were done in the five seconds before > Anthony mailed -devel-announce. :) Ok, that sounds reasonable :) However, is there any way of getting it into testing again? The RC bug is fixed for quite a while... CU Thimo -- Thimo Neubauer <thimo@debian.org> Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 frozen! See http://www.debian.org/ for details
Attachment:
pgplH8b384aZ6.pgp
Description: PGP signature