Re: on potato's proftpd
Previously martin f krafft wrote:
> wichert, it didn't. why should we discuss this before pushing the
> temporary fix into the security archives???
Because it might impact other packages as well.
> i'd also like to see answered, but right now, debian's got a semi-bug
> in a package found on security.debian.org, we know about it, why do we
> even hesitate?
I'ld rather make sure we don't have a bug in multiple packages then
a reasonably harmless semi-bug in a single package.
/firstname.lastname@example.org This space intentionally left occupied \
| email@example.com http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com