On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 04:10:48PM -0500, Stephen Ryan wrote: > However, since GNU has never been an actual releasable operating system > in any sense of the word, that kind of complaining about credit mostly > just sounds like sour grapes. Linux without GNU has never been an actual releasable operating system either. Linux without GNU isn't even an actual operating system (aside from a few not much used corncer cases), GNU without Linux is. So why name it Linux and not GNU? I don't think your reasoning is really right. Jeroen Dekkers -- Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: jdekkers@jabber.org Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org IRC: jeroen@openprojects
Attachment:
pgpjXptEZxVUq.pgp
Description: PGP signature