Re: Should debootstrap's requirement be standard or base?
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 03:13:43PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Anthony Towns]
> > This is the correct thing to do. You shouldn't try using priorities or
> > sections to work out what's in base.
> So the part of debian-cd choosing packages based on section and
> priority should be taken out?
Not per se: you should run debootstrap to get a list of base packages,
and make sure that's on the first CD, and then fill it up with priority:
standard packages, then any nice tasks.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Debian: giving you the power to shoot yourself in each
toe individually.'' -- with kudos to Greg Lehey
Reply to: