On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 06:07:29PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >>"Jeff" == Jeff Licquia <licquia@debian.org> writes: > > Jeff> On Sat, 2002-03-16 at 15:39, Steve Langasek wrote: > >> I object to using any subjective method (such as popular vote) for > >> determining which packages should be conflicted with in such a package. > > Jeff> OK; we can scratch the Conflicts: part unless someone else can give a > Jeff> good reason to have it. The package can act like vrms, and provide a > Jeff> report of some kind. Perhaps the package could also take configuration > Jeff> (adding or removing packages for personal preference), and could > Jeff> possibly produce a package via equivs or some such for those who want > Jeff> it. > > That woulds be amusing, if we do manage to get an essential > package deemed inappropriate (the kernel has quite inappropriate and > offensive language in it) Is there anything offensive and/or inappropriate language in gnumach version 2 aka OSKit-Mach? That should be fixable. Jeroen Dekkers -- Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: jdekkers@jabber.org Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org IRC: jeroen@openprojects
Attachment:
pgp_2fS9jwAQN.pgp
Description: PGP signature