Re: FYI: problems with spamassassin and procmail?

["Francesco P. Lovergine" <frankie@debian.org>]

On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 08:50:23PM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > I used something like:
> > 
> > :0fw
> > | nice spamassassin -P
> > 
> > :0e
> > {
> >     EXITCODE=$?
> > }
> > 
> > :0:
> > * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> > spam
> > 
> > 
> > in my .procmailrc
> > 
> 
> Try using:
> :0fw
> | nice spamassassin -P
> 
> :0:
> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> spam
> 
> 
> (From /usr/share/doc/spamassassin/procmail.example)
> 

That's great: my configuration was the old procmail.example :)
It is now changed (maybe someone complained for the same reasons)
in the package.


> This will cause no bounces. If spamassassin fails, procmail will recover and
> mail will still get through (although unfiltered).
> 
> 
> As far as speed goes, spamd and spamc will help immensely. All you need to
> do is edit /etc/default/spamassassin and change ENABLED to 1, and add the
> options you want to OPTIONS. (and then /etc/init.d/spamassassin restart)
> 

Ok, I'm now trying with spamd/spac. Stay tuned. :)

-- 
Francesco P. Lovergine