Re: [2002-03-10] Release Status Update

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [2002-03-10] Release Status Update
From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 09:00:45 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020313090045.55db0fb1.dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E16kmeg-0006yh-00.2002-03-12-13-49-30@mail12.svr.pol.co.uk>
References: <20020310070858.GB29488@azure.humbug.org.au> <[🔎] E16kcRC-0006Fa-00.2002-03-12-02-54-54@mail3.svr.pol.co.uk> <[🔎] 20020312035940.GA22598@licquia.org> <[🔎] E16kmeg-0006yh-00.2002-03-12-13-49-30@mail12.svr.pol.co.uk>

Will Newton <will@misconception.org.uk> cum veritate scripsit:

> The problem is not really serious as far as I can tell the only dependencies 
> of libxalan are packages built from the same source. However the current 
> scheme of changing package name on every minor version (e.g. libxalan1.2, 
> libxalan1.2-dev) is suboptimal IMO.

welcome to the world of sonames, and library dependencies.

regards,
	junichi

-- 
dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa   http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423  7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4

Reply to:

References:
- Re: [2002-03-10] Release Status Update
  - From: Will Newton <will@misconception.org.uk>
- Re: [2002-03-10] Release Status Update
  - From: Jeff Licquia <licquia@debian.org>
- Re: [2002-03-10] Release Status Update
  - From: Will Newton <will@misconception.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Debian joining OASIS?
Next by Date: Re: Debian joining OASIS?
Previous by thread: Re: [2002-03-10] Release Status Update
Next by thread: Re: [2002-03-10] Release Status Update
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread